H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Kora Schediwy H2H: 3-0
Evonne Goolagong holds a 3–0 lead over Kora Schediwy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1971 Hilversum semifinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1971* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Evonne Goolagong | 6-3 6-2 | Kora Schediwy | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1970* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Evonne Goolagong | 6-1 6-1 | Kora Schediwy | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1970* | Munich | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Evonne Goolagong | 6-1 7-5 | Kora Schediwy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Kora Schediwy | — | — | — | 1,704 | 70 | 76 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Evonne Goolagong | Kora Schediwy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | 1970 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | 1971 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1973 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1974 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | 1978 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |