H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 5-3

Evonne Goolagong holds a 5–3 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Pam Teeguarden leads 3–2 on grass, while Evonne Goolagong leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1982 Birmingham second round 6-4 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 1982* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Pam Teeguarden 6-4 2-6 6-3 Evonne Goolagong Match data
Jun 16, 1979* Chichester WTA 250 QF Grass Evonne Goolagong 6-2 7-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data
May 24, 1979* Berlin WTA 500 R32 Clay Evonne Goolagong 6-2 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Jun 18, 1978* Chichester WTA 250 F Grass Evonne Goolagong 6-4 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Jun 19, 1975* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Pam Teeguarden 8-6 6-2 Evonne Goolagong Match data
Sep 28, 1974* Denver WTA 250 QF Carpet Evonne Goolagong 7-5 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Jun 8, 1973* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Evonne Goolagong 6-2 7-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Sep 7, 1972* US Open Grand Slam R16 Grass Pam Teeguarden 7-5 6-1 Evonne Goolagong Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Evonne Goolagong #85 #35 — 2,471 735 158 82.3% 7 2 1 8 66 84
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,926 245 296 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,630 0 3 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,509 0 0
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 1,999 0 13 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,506 0 0
19 1971 96–16 85.7% — 2,174 2 26 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,629 0 1
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,238 2 38 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,681 0 1
21 1973 102–14 87.9% — 2,297 2 50 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,874 0 1
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,326 3 58 1973 21–22 48.8% — 1,846 0 1
23 1975 53–13 80.3% — 2,265 4 62 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,905 0 3
24 1976 57–6 90.5% — 2,425 5 69 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,815 0 3
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,435 6 73 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,775 0 3
26 1978 47–9 83.9% — 2,353 6 79 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,783 0 3
27 1979 53–11 82.8% — 2,314 6 83 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,740 0 3
28 1980 38–19 66.7% — 2,165 7 84 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,748 0 3
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,144 7 84 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,803 0 3
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,052 7 84 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,788 0 4
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,943 7 84 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,684 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,653 0 4
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,914 7 84 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,616 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,588 0 4