H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Rosie Casals H2H: 12-1
Evonne Goolagong holds a 12–1 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 8–1 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1980 Dallas third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
12
–
1
13 main draw meetings
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Rosie Casals | #207 | #55 | — | 2,203 | 594 | 322 | 64.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evonne Goolagong | Rosie Casals | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | 1968 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1969 | 42–19 | 68.9% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1970 | 52–21 | 71.2% | — | 2,035 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1971 | 92–31 | 74.8% | — | 2,162 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | 1972 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 2,098 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | 1973 | 81–28 | 74.3% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | 1974 | 43–16 | 72.9% | — | 2,127 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | 1975 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | 1976 | 39–17 | 69.6% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | 1977 | 41–20 | 67.2% | — | 2,044 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | 1978 | 24–15 | 61.5% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | 1979 | 19–26 | 42.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | 1980 | 14–25 | 35.9% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | 1982 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,610 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 12 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 12 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 12 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 12 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 12 |