H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 2-0
Evonne Goolagong holds a 2–0 lead over Stacy Margolin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1980 Chicago third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1980* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Evonne Goolagong | 6-1 6-1 | Stacy Margolin | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1980* | Kansas City | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Evonne Goolagong | 6-7 6-1 7-5 | Stacy Margolin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Stacy Margolin | — | — | — | 1,855 | 73 | 98 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evonne Goolagong | Stacy Margolin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | 1977 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | 1978 | 16–5 | 76.2% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1980 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1981 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |