H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 0-2

Sylvia Hanika holds a 2–0 lead over Evonne Goolagong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1980 Chicago round of 16 6-4 6-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Sylvia Hanika
GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sylvia Hanika 6-4 6-7 6-4 Evonne Goolagong Match data Jan 25, 1980* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Sylvia Hanika 7-5 3-6 7-5 Evonne Goolagong Match data May 12, 1979* SF Italian Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evonne Goolagong #85 #1 — 2,481 736 159 82.2% 7 0 2 8 68 85
Sylvia Hanika #223 #5 48 2,135 415 239 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Sylvia Hanika
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,533 0 0
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,631 0 3 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,583 0 0
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 2,001 0 13 1978 27–14 65.9% — 1,818 0 1
19 1971 94–15 86.2% — 2,177 2 26 1979 26–16 61.9% — 1,949 0 3
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,244 2 39 1980 40–22 64.5% — 2,000 0 4
21 1973 105–15 87.5% — 2,298 2 51 1981 61–23 72.6% #6 2,082 0 6
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,351 3 59 1982 41–23 64.1% #10 1,944 0 7
23 1975 53–14 79.1% #5 2,260 4 63 1983 47–22 68.1% #5 1,969 0 7
24 1976 57–6 90.5% #2 2,436 5 70 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,879 0 8
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,446 6 74 1985 22–16 57.9% #19 1,868 0 8
26 1978 47–9 83.9% #3 2,400 6 80 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,803 0 9
27 1979 53–11 82.8% #4 2,387 6 84 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,920 0 9
28 1980 38–19 66.7% #5 2,215 7 85 1988 44–22 66.7% #17 1,919 0 9
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,188 7 85 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,806 0 9
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,086 7 85 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,702 0 9
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,968 7 85 — — — — — — —
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,938 7 85 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evonne Goolagong Sylvia Hanika
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1977 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1970 — — — — 46 9 55 83.6% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0%
19 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 34 3 37 91.9% 36 5 41 87.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 1979 5 5 10 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
20 1972 6 0 6 100.0% 33 3 36 91.7% 47 6 53 88.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
21 1973 8 2 10 80.0% 57 7 64 89.1% 36 5 41 87.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1981 15 6 21 71.4% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 26 10 36 72.2%
22 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 14 3 17 82.4% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 1 11 90.9% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4%
23 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 21 3 24 87.5% 22 7 29 75.9% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 28 12 40 70.0%
24 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 2 15 86.7% 38 2 40 95.0% 1984 10 6 16 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
25 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 20 0 20 100.0% — — — — 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1978 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 26 5 31 83.9% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 8 1 9 88.9% 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
28 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 2 13 84.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1981 — — — — — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1989 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1983 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 16 61 73.8% 235 48 283 83.0% 306 58 364 84.1% 146 37 183 79.8% — 99 60 159 62.3% 129 64 193 66.8% 38 32 70 54.3% 144 80 224 64.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evonne Goolagong Sylvia Hanika
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1579 113.7 — — — — — +22 -16 65.5% +1.31 2–1 (67%) — — +0.86 1976 1533 101.8 — — — — +88 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 1–1 — +0.64
17 1969 1631 119.0 — — — — — +3 -2 62.2% +0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +2.49 1977 1583 118.4 — — — — +76 -23 — 55.6% +1.28 2–0 1–1 — +1.08
18 1970 2002 148.5 — — — — — +43 -34 73.1% +1.82 18–4 (82%) — — -2.81 1978 1818 145.7 — — — — -59 -184 -96 62.6% +1.14 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.8 +0.92
19 1971 2177 163.9 — — — — -178 +39 +100 80.0% +2.29 19–8 (70%) 9–4 (69%) 110.4 -4.23 1979 1950 158.1 — — — — -89 -104 -186 57.9% +0.65 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 106.5 -2.88
20 1972 2245 167.1 — — — — -99 +89 +77 85.6% +2.86 10–4 (71%) 8–4 (67%) 103.9 -4.28 1980 2000 158.9 — — — — +10 -66 -216 61.3% +0.93 11–4 (73%) 4–5 (44%) 105.0 -5.90
21 1973 2299 171.3 — — — — -145 +134 +109 83.3% +2.75 13–5 (72%) 9–5 (64%) 102.6 -6.12 1981 2083 166.3 — — — — -7 +24 — 68.4% +1.72 12–7 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 -8.48
22 1974 2351 167.4 — — — — -72 +43 +91 78.5% +2.12 17–7 (71%) 11–5 (69%) 104.6 -5.92 1982 1945 156.9 — — — — +135 +62 -221 64.4% +1.18 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 94.4 -3.08
23 1975 2261 167.4 — — — — -54 +112 +127 74.1% +1.80 10–5 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -5.65 1983 1970 162.8 — — — — +80 +36 -190 63.4% +1.12 17–8 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 -1.00
24 1976 2436 178.6 — — — — +145 -77 -22 86.5% +2.94 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 106.2 -6.86 1984 1880 145.1 — — — — +102 +49 -140 58.5% +0.42 10–4 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 105.7 -0.52
25 1977 2447 165.4 — — — — — — +85 87.2% +3.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — -0.55 1985 1868 147.4 — — — — +26 +92 — 59.5% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 99.7 -2.48
26 1978 2400 169.9 — — — — +62 — +135 81.4% +2.45 7–2 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 102.4 -1.73 1986 1804 136.2 — — — — +8 +158 -100 51.6% -0.02 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.61
27 1979 2388 168.5 — — — — +66 -113 +142 80.0% +2.27 11–2 (85%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 -4.29 1987 1921 155.2 — — — — +18 +1 -154 62.2% +0.91 7–10 (41%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -1.68
28 1980 2215 171.5 — — — — +110 +2 +349 66.9% +1.37 5–7 (42%) 6–7 (46%) 90.5 -5.70 1988 1919 153.3 — — — — +53 +15 -189 61.6% +0.85 14–5 (74%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 -1.35
29 1981 2188 131.2 — — — — — — +292 58.8% +0.35 1–0 1–0 — -0.64 1989 1806 132.5 — — — — +30 +122 — 52.9% +0.26 9–1 (90%) 4–4 (50%) 103.4 +0.61
30 1982 2087 128.7 — — — — — — +197 53.6% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -1.16 1990 1703 116.6 — — — — +42 +152 — 50.0% -0.35 2–6 (25%) — — +0.80
31 1983 1968 127.4 — — — — — +111 — 51.4% +0.14 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1939 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2482 169.9 — — — — +9 +59 +94 77.8% +2.19 130–52 (71%) 71–38 (65%) 111.0 -5.27 — 2136 159.8 — — — — +38 +22 -162 61.2% +0.90 114–67 (63%) 50–53 (49%) 100.1 -3.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.