H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Tam Oshaughnessy H2H: 1-0
Evonne Goolagong holds a 1–0 lead over Tam Oshaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evonne Goolagong leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1972 Dublin fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1972* | Dublin | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Evonne Goolagong | 6-1 6-3 | Tam Oshaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Tam Oshaughnessy | — | — | — | 1,500 | 16 | 51 | 23.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Evonne Goolagong | Tam Oshaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | 1971 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,387 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1972 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1974 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |