H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Terry Holladay H2H: 4-0
Evonne Goolagong holds a 4–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1980 Dallas fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1980* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Evonne Goolagong | 6-1 6-2 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1977* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Evonne Goolagong | 6-0 2-6 6-4 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1976* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Evonne Goolagong | 6-4 6-2 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1974* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Evonne Goolagong | 6-2 6-2 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evonne Goolagong | Terry Holladay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |