H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Tracy Austin H2H: 4-3

Evonne Goolagong holds a 4–3 lead over Tracy Austin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Tracy Austin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1980 Tokyo Lion Cup semifinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 22, 1980* Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 SF Carpet Tracy Austin 6-3 6-3 Evonne Goolagong Match data
Jul 6, 1980* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Evonne Goolagong 6-3 0-6 6-4 Tracy Austin Match data
Mar 17, 1980 Avon Championships WTA Finals RR Carpet Tracy Austin 6-1 4-6 7-6 Evonne Goolagong Match data
Oct 27, 1979* Tampa WTA 250 SF Hard Evonne Goolagong 6-4 6-1 Tracy Austin Match data
Oct 6, 1979* Minneapolis WTA 250 SF Carpet Evonne Goolagong 7-6 6-0 Tracy Austin Match data
Apr 15, 1979* Hilton Head WTA 250 SF Clay Tracy Austin 6-0 6-1 Evonne Goolagong Match data
Mar 12, 1978* Dallas WTA 250 F Carpet Evonne Goolagong 4-6 6-0 6-2 Tracy Austin Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Evonne Goolagong #85 #35 — 2,471 735 158 82.3% 7 2 1 8 66 84
Tracy Austin #81 #4 19 2,484 339 88 79.4% 2 2 1 4 19 28

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,777 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1978 43–13 76.8% — 2,055 0 2
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 1979 73–12 85.9% — 2,412 1 9
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,630 0 3 1980 81–10 89.0% — 2,383 1 19
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 1,999 0 13 1981 56–7 88.9% — 2,406 2 27
19 1971 96–16 85.7% — 2,174 2 26 1982 35–12 74.5% — 2,224 2 28
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,238 2 38 1983 24–8 75.0% — 2,162 2 28
21 1973 102–14 87.9% — 2,297 2 50 1984 2–2 50.0% #27 2,115 2 28
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,326 3 58 — — — — — — —
23 1975 53–13 80.3% — 2,265 4 62 — — — — — — —
24 1976 57–6 90.5% — 2,425 5 69 — — — — — — —
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,435 6 73 — — — — — — —
26 1978 47–9 83.9% — 2,353 6 79 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,057 2 28
27 1979 53–11 82.8% — 2,314 6 83 — — — — — — —
28 1980 38–19 66.7% — 2,165 7 84 — — — — — — —
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,144 7 84 — — — — — — —
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,052 7 84 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,955 2 28
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,943 7 84 1994 5–8 38.5% #81 1,840 2 28
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,914 7 84 — — — — — — —