H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Evonne Goolagong vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-2
Zina Garrison holds a 2–0 lead over Evonne Goolagong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1983 Hilton Head third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1983* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Zina Garrison | 7-5 6-3 | Evonne Goolagong | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Zina Garrison | 6-4 6-2 | Evonne Goolagong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evonne Goolagong | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |