H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Fabiola Zuluaga vs Anne Kremer H2H: 0-2

Anne Kremer holds a 2–0 lead over Fabiola Zuluaga in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2004 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabiola Zuluaga
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Kremer #181 6-4 6-3 Fabiola Zuluaga #22 Match data Jun 23, 2004* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Anne Kremer #34 6-2 6-4 Fabiola Zuluaga #55 Match data Jul 30, 1999* R16 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fabiola Zuluaga #85 #16 1,362 1,835 117 99 54.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 148 185 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabiola Zuluaga Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1994 0–2 0.0% #386 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1995 0–1 0.0% #290 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 0–1 0.0% #138 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #169 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 3–2 60.0% #87 1,504 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1999 19–11 63.3% #51 1,686 0 2 1996 2–5 28.6% #134 1,507 0 0
21 2000 20–19 51.3% #39 1,712 0 2 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,509 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,552 0 0
23 2002 13–12 52.0% #75 1,666 0 3 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,639 0 0
24 2003 21–17 55.3% #38 1,739 0 4 2000 28–25 52.8% #33 1,708 0 2
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,752 0 5 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2005 12–13 48.0% #85 1,686 0 5 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,671 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,635 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2004 12–15 44.4% #94 1,606 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,518 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,524 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,517 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,460 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,474 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fabiola Zuluaga Anne Kremer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 15 4 19 78.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2000 8 11 19 42.1% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2002 4 6 10 40.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 10 10 20 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 19 14 33 57.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 2005 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 12 14 26 46.2% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 49 53 102 48.0% 66 37 103 64.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — 73 104 177 41.2% 33 40 73 45.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fabiola Zuluaga Anne Kremer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1994 1485 102.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 1465 96.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1460 101.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1505 114.3 — — — — — +30 — 63.6% +0.18 0–1 — — +0.29 1995 1517 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.09
20 1999 1686 133.5 — — — — -128 +93 — 59.7% +0.76 5–2 (71%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +1.62 1996 1508 105.0 — — — — — +41 +58 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — -0.12
21 2000 1713 133.4 — — — — -95 +91 — 50.6% +0.08 8–5 (62%) 1–3 (25%) 104.6 -0.66 1997 1509 117.6 — — — — +41 — — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — -0.53
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1552 126.8 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 — — -0.65
23 2002 1667 121.4 — — — — -75 +130 — 54.2% +0.19 3–6 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 92.8 +0.66 1999 1640 130.5 — — — — -17 -83 -13 46.8% -0.28 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 98.6 +1.35
24 2003 1739 143.7 +2.36 +1.63 1.143 53.0% -113 +126 — 53.0% +0.79 5–2 (71%) 2–7 (22%) 101.6 -1.64 2000 1708 137.5 — — — — -4 -167 +12 54.7% +0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 +0.80
25 2004 1753 138.7 +2.34 +0.87 1.125 52.5% -65 +168 — 54.3% +0.26 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 106.7 +0.79 2001 1695 135.0 — — — — +2 -55 +63 51.4% +0.08 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 106.4 -0.14
26 2005 1687 135.3 +1.78 +3.46 1.309 56.7% +11 +137 — 49.0% -0.02 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 -0.43 2002 1671 136.3 — — — — -30 +44 +113 48.9% +0.03 11–6 (65%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -0.24
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1635 94.6 — — — — -26 — — 33.3% -1.33 — — — +0.58
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1606 116.6 — — — — -50 +62 +217 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 -0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1519 109.7 -2.01 -0.99 0.878 46.9% -41 +130 +270 32.5% -1.13 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 108.9 -3.12 -1.22 0.801 44.7% -70 +140 — 33.3% -1.56 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.81
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1517 118.0 -2.42 -0.54 0.875 46.9% -37 +124 — 41.9% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.03
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1460 103.3 -3.64 -1.04 0.816 45.2% +16 +103 — 30.0% -1.70 0–2 2–0 — +0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1474 105.0 -0.28 -0.99 0.717 42.3% +16 — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.74
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1463 94.3 -4.07 -2.73 0.727 42.9% +14 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 2–0 — +0.19
Career — 1835 140.2 +2.22 +1.70 1.172 53.6% -74 +118 — 52.8% +0.27 31–26 (54%) 15–21 (42%) 101.0 +0.22 — 1810 132.2 -2.85 -1.19 0.815 45.3% -14 +3 +102 45.5% -0.32 47–51 (48%) 33–33 (50%) 100.8 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.