H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Fabiola Zuluaga vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 1-1
Fabiola Zuluaga and Denisa Chladkova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on clay, while Fabiola Zuluaga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabiola Zuluaga won the 2005 Sydney third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2005* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Fabiola Zuluaga | 6-2 6-4 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| May 3, 2003* | Warsaw | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Denisa Chladkova | 7-5 7-5 | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabiola Zuluaga | Denisa Chladkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |