H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Fabiola Zuluaga vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 1-1
Fabiola Zuluaga and Julie Halard-Decugis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fabiola Zuluaga leads 1–0 on clay, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabiola Zuluaga won the 2000 Rome fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2000* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Fabiola Zuluaga | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-3 6-3 | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabiola Zuluaga | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |