H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Fabiola Zuluaga vs Mary Pierce H2H: 1-1

Fabiola Zuluaga and Mary Pierce are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on grass, while Fabiola Zuluaga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabiola Zuluaga won the 2004 Zurich round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabiola Zuluaga
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fabiola Zuluaga #24 6-3 6-2 Mary Pierce #28 Match data Oct 21, 2004* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Mary Pierce #7 6-3 6-2 Fabiola Zuluaga #48 Match data Jun 23, 1999* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fabiola Zuluaga #85 #16 1,362 1,835 117 99 54.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabiola Zuluaga Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1994 0–2 0.0% #386 1,484 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1995 0–1 0.0% #290 1,480 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1
17 1996 0–1 0.0% #138 1,465 0 0 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #169 1,459 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 1998 3–2 60.0% #87 1,504 0 0 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5
20 1999 19–11 63.3% #51 1,686 0 2 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7
21 2000 20–19 51.3% #39 1,712 0 2 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7
22 — — — — — — — 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8
23 2002 13–12 52.0% #75 1,666 0 3 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12
24 2003 21–17 55.3% #38 1,739 0 4 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #23 1,752 0 5 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15
26 2005 12–13 48.0% #85 1,686 0 5 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15
27 — — — — — — — 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15
28 — — — — — — — 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 — — — — — — — 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16
30 — — — — — — — 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18
31 — — — — — — — 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fabiola Zuluaga Mary Pierce
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0%
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6%
20 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 15 4 19 78.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2000 8 11 19 42.1% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2002 4 6 10 40.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3%
24 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2005 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 49 53 102 48.0% 66 37 103 64.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fabiola Zuluaga Mary Pierce
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34
15 1994 1485 102.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.10 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17
16 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.05 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05
17 1996 1465 96.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22
18 1997 1460 101.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.14 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14
19 1998 1505 114.3 — — — — — +30 — 63.6% +0.18 0–1 — — +0.29 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50
20 1999 1686 133.5 — — — — -128 +93 — 59.7% +0.76 5–2 (71%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +1.62 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10
21 2000 1713 133.4 — — — — -95 +91 — 50.6% +0.08 8–5 (62%) 1–3 (25%) 104.6 -0.66 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07
23 2002 1667 121.4 — — — — -75 +130 — 54.2% +0.19 3–6 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 92.8 +0.66 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64
24 2003 1739 143.7 +2.36 +1.63 1.143 53.0% -113 +126 — 53.0% +0.79 5–2 (71%) 2–7 (22%) 101.6 -1.64 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22
25 2004 1753 138.7 +2.34 +0.87 1.125 52.5% -65 +168 — 54.3% +0.26 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 106.7 +0.79 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29
26 2005 1687 135.3 +1.78 +3.46 1.309 56.7% +11 +137 — 49.0% -0.02 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 -0.43 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83
Career — 1835 140.2 +2.22 +1.70 1.172 53.6% -74 +118 — 52.8% +0.27 31–26 (54%) 15–21 (42%) 101.0 +0.22 — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.