H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fabiola Zuluaga vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 2-1
Fabiola Zuluaga holds a 2–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fabiola Zuluaga leads 2–0 on clay, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meghann Shaughnessy won the 2003 Los Angeles third round 3-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2003* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
| May 8, 2003* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Fabiola Zuluaga | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1999* | Bogota | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Fabiola Zuluaga | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabiola Zuluaga | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |