H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fabiola Zuluaga vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 1-2
Nicole Pratt holds a 2–1 lead over Fabiola Zuluaga in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabiola Zuluaga won the 2000 Quebec City third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2000* | Quebec City | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Fabiola Zuluaga | 6-4 6-3 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2000* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Nicole Pratt | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2000* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Nicole Pratt | 6-4 7-6(3) | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Nicole Pratt | #1,043 | #35 | 924 | 1,764 | 156 | 217 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabiola Zuluaga | Nicole Pratt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #224 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #56 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #126 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |