H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Fabiola Zuluaga vs Rita Grande H2H: 3-0
Fabiola Zuluaga holds a 3–0 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fabiola Zuluaga leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabiola Zuluaga won the 2002 Madrid fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2002* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Fabiola Zuluaga | 7-5 7-5 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2000* | Japan Open | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Fabiola Zuluaga | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Fabiola Zuluaga | 6-4 6-4 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabiola Zuluaga | Rita Grande | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 |