H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fabiola Zuluaga vs Rita Kuti-Kis H2H: 1-0
Fabiola Zuluaga holds a 1–0 lead over Rita Kuti-Kis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fabiola Zuluaga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabiola Zuluaga won the 2002 Bogota fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 48
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2002* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Fabiola Zuluaga | 6-3 6-2 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Rita Kuti-Kis | #1,325 | #47 | 660 | 1,700 | 58 | 68 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabiola Zuluaga | Rita Kuti-Kis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #183 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #87 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #56 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #171 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,476 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |