H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fabiola Zuluaga vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 0-3
Tatiana Panova holds a 3–0 lead over Fabiola Zuluaga in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2002 US Open second round 5-7 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Tatiana Panova | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2000* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tatiana Panova | 6-4 6-1 | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1999* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tatiana Panova | 6-4 6-3 | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabiola Zuluaga | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |