H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Fang Li vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 0-1
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 1–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gabriela Sabatini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1993 Tokyo Nichirei third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1993* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-1 6-2 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fang Li | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 |
| 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 |
| 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 |
| 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 |
| 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 |
| 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 |