H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Fang Li vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 0-2
Ginger Helgeson holds a 2–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1995 Auckland quarterfinal W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1995* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | (w/o) | Fang Li | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ginger Helgeson | 6-1 6-2 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fang Li | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |