H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Fang Li vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-1

Fang Li and Judith Wiesner are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1996 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Judith Wiesner #26 6-3 7-6 Fang Li #141 Match data Mar 13, 1996* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Fang Li #67 6-4 1-6 6-3 Judith Wiesner #25 Match data Jan 14, 1995* SF Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,976 303 179 62.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fang Li Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
21 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,695 0 0
22 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,753 0 1
23 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,735 0 2
24 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
25 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
26 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0 1992 29–18 61.7% #25 1,911 0 3
27 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,905 0 3
28 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,894 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,915 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 36–23 61.0% #15 1,922 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,826 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fang Li Judith Wiesner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 21 7 28 75.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 11 6 17 64.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 5 10 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — 106 64 170 62.4% 131 72 203 64.5% 25 13 38 65.8% 41 30 71 57.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fang Li Judith Wiesner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1985 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.09
20 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54 1986 1514 117.4 — — — — — +64 — 53.3% +0.60 1–2 (33%) — — +0.77
21 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90 1987 1696 127.6 — — — — -111 +11 -79 57.1% +0.56 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.5 +2.26
22 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34 1988 1754 146.4 — — — — -139 +74 — 53.7% +0.41 10–7 (59%) 4–1 (80%) 106.3 -0.01
23 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31 1989 1736 132.1 — — — — -75 +91 -114 61.0% +0.74 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 100.4 +3.28
24 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54 1990 1846 152.4 — — — — -25 +17 -141 64.7% +1.10 9–6 (60%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.74
25 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15 1991 1963 155.9 — — — — -24 -50 -187 61.1% +0.73 9–1 (90%) 3–4 (43%) 108.4 -2.10
26 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13 1992 1912 147.1 — — — — -3 +17 -128 57.7% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.07
27 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39 1993 1906 147.9 — — — — -21 +50 — 60.4% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 -1.43
28 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 1994 1894 149.7 — — — — -18 +42 — 63.5% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 96.6 +0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1915 149.4 — — — — +25 -25 -156 61.8% +1.24 11–7 (61%) 2–9 (18%) 92.9 -1.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1923 154.0 — — — — +7 -98 -7 59.8% +0.61 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -2.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1826 137.1 — — — — +35 -4 +98 61.8% +0.87 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 95.1 +0.60
Career — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98 — 1976 153.6 — — — — -20 +18 -79 60.2% +0.76 84–63 (57%) 50–36 (58%) 106.1 -0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.