H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Fang Li vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-1
Fang Li and Judith Wiesner are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1996 Indian Wells second round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 6-3 7-6 | Fang Li | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1995* | Hobart | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Fang Li | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fang Li | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |