H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Fang Li vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 0-1

Larisa Savchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 128 0-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Larisa Savchenko
URS Age 60 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Larisa Savchenko #117 0-6 7-5 6-2 Fang Li #92 Match data Jun 23, 1999* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 240 241 49.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fang Li Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,506 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,673 0 0
19 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,752 0 0
20 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,793 0 0
21 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0 1988 28–17 62.2% #16 1,869 0 0
22 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,861 0 0
23 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,706 0 0
24 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,699 0 1
25 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0 1992 18–19 48.6% #58 1,720 0 1
26 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,752 0 2
27 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
28 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,650 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,668 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,620 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,585 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fang Li Larisa Savchenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
19 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 3 9 12 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3%
25 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — 97 102 199 48.7% 27 47 74 36.5% 70 46 116 60.3% 46 46 92 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fang Li Larisa Savchenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1498 109.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1507 116.6 — — — — — +100 +55 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +0.25
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1674 126.0 — — — — -46 -159 -3 44.2% -0.31 9–6 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 104.0 -0.37
19 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1986 1752 135.5 — — — — -106 -188 +58 51.2% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.9 -1.29
20 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54 1987 1793 136.6 — — — — -74 -246 +115 60.8% +0.61 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.13
21 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90 1988 1870 156.5 — — — — -44 — +85 56.9% +0.37 13–8 (62%) 11–6 (65%) 107.7 -2.81
22 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34 1989 1862 145.0 — — — — +27 -238 +26 60.2% +0.39 5–10 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.3 -0.82
23 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31 1990 1707 132.7 — — — — -4 -54 +235 43.7% -0.39 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 97.9 -0.20
24 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54 1991 1699 122.6 — — — — +18 -58 +204 53.7% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +1.48
25 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15 1992 1721 141.5 — — — — +9 -77 +179 49.4% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 96.8 -1.79
26 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13 1993 1753 140.6 — — — — +6 -113 +158 52.3% -0.05 7–5 (58%) 3–6 (33%) 98.9 -0.11
27 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39 1994 1809 144.2 — — — — -28 -170 +83 48.4% -0.13 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 102.0 -3.68
28 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 1995 1650 126.3 — — — — +4 -8 +193 39.1% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +0.43
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1668 126.6 — — — — -51 -53 +258 44.1% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — -1.58
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1621 121.0 — — — — +6 -24 +203 38.0% -0.46 5–3 (63%) 0–6 (0%) 97.6 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1653 111.5 — — — — -22 -84 +168 48.8% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 +0.09
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1586 92.7 — — — — -28 -65 +209 28.0% -2.28 2–3 (40%) — — +0.24
Career — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98 — 1927 142.7 — — — — -21 -97 +127 49.6% -0.13 96–79 (55%) 46–56 (45%) 98.2 -1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.