H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Fang Li vs Laura Garrone H2H: 1-0

Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Garrone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1994 Palermo round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Garrone
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fang Li #81 6-4 6-1 Laura Garrone #183 Match data Jul 9, 1994* R16 Palermo Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laura Garrone #262 #32 90 1,726 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fang Li Laura Garrone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% #234 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 5–5 50.0% #203 1,530 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1986 22–14 61.1% #38 1,678 0 0
19 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0 1987 15–17 46.9% #86 1,611 0 0
20 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0 1988 17–17 50.0% #64 1,637 0 0
21 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0 1989 14–17 45.2% #87 1,607 0 0
22 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0 1990 14–15 48.3% #65 1,609 0 0
23 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0 1991 10–14 41.7% #93 1,622 0 0
24 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0 1992 5–12 29.4% #156 1,559 0 0
25 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0 1993 0–3 0.0% #169 1,521 0 0
26 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #167 1,519 0 0
27 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #194 1,492 0 0
28 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0 1996 1–3 25.0% #258 1,467 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1997 2–2 50.0% #224 1,501 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fang Li Laura Garrone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 3 7 10 30.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 — — — — 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — 12 22 34 35.3% 88 90 178 49.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 11 15 26.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fang Li Laura Garrone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1491 101.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1530 112.1 — — — — +27 +58 — 50.0% +0.09 1–1 — — +1.29
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1679 134.8 — — — — -125 +127 — 60.2% +0.82 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 +2.90
19 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1987 1612 116.6 — — — — -75 +112 -43 46.7% -0.13 6–7 (46%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 +4.27
20 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54 1988 1638 122.2 — — — — -120 +69 — 49.4% -0.04 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 +1.56
21 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90 1989 1608 123.3 — — — — -78 +56 — 44.1% -0.31 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +2.18
22 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34 1990 1609 114.2 — — — — -61 +31 — 47.8% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +1.49
23 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31 1991 1623 119.5 — — — — -83 -31 +17 42.6% -0.87 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.5 -0.55
24 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54 1992 1559 114.1 — — — — -34 +20 — 32.4% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.6 -0.10
25 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15 1993 1522 103.3 — — — — — +11 — 25.0% -1.37 0–2 — — -0.08
26 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13 1994 1520 113.3 — — — — — +23 — 37.5% -0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.17
27 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39 1995 1492 97.8 — — — — — +14 — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.33
28 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 1996 1468 98.9 — — — — — +5 — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 0–1 — +0.48
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1501 112.4 — — — — — +13 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
Career — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98 — 1726 125.1 — — — — -79 +56 -17 46.4% -0.19 36–45 (44%) 18–21 (46%) 97.2 +5.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.