H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Fang Li vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 1-1

Fang Li and Laura Golarsa are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fang Li leads 1–0 on clay, while Laura Golarsa leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1998 Budapest round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Laura Golarsa
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fang Li #44 6-2 6-4 Laura Golarsa #73 Match data Apr 24, 1998* R16 Budapest Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Laura Golarsa #94 6-3 6-0 Fang Li #91 Match data Jun 24, 1994* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laura Golarsa #693 #39 436 1,761 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fang Li Laura Golarsa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1985 5–1 83.3% #166 1,563 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1986 5–5 50.0% #167 1,593 0 1
19 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0 1987 6–10 37.5% #121 1,574 0 1
20 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0 1988 11–14 44.0% #79 1,618 0 1
21 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0 1989 22–18 55.0% #58 1,707 0 1
22 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0 1990 14–16 46.7% #61 1,689 0 1
23 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0 1991 3–13 18.8% #213 1,546 0 1
24 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0 1992 5–10 33.3% #125 1,522 0 1
25 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0 1993 17–18 48.6% #69 1,637 0 1
26 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0 1994 13–22 37.1% #112 1,582 0 1
27 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0 1995 5–10 33.3% #149 1,551 0 1
28 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0 1996 1–8 11.1% #145 1,468 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1997 7–9 43.8% #62 1,532 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1998 10–16 38.5% #94 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1999 3–10 23.1% #168 1,512 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fang Li Laura Golarsa
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 6 5 11 54.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 8 8 16 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 4 10 14 28.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 6 11 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — 32 57 89 36.0% 38 66 104 36.5% 36 32 68 52.9% 16 25 41 39.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fang Li Laura Golarsa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1564 114.0 — — — — — — — 78.6% +1.93 1–1 2–0 — +0.48
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1593 115.4 — — — — — -11 — 47.6% -0.29 1–0 — — +0.49
19 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1987 1575 116.4 — — — — 0 -50 — 44.4% -0.45 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.08
20 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54 1988 1619 117.2 — — — — -50 -32 -19 41.1% -0.75 5–1 (83%) 1–4 (20%) 103.9 -0.38
21 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90 1989 1707 132.8 — — — — -45 -99 -6 54.0% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 101.3 +0.90
22 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34 1990 1690 132.5 — — — — -82 -4 +52 46.8% -0.02 1–3 (25%) 2–6 (25%) 94.9 -1.45
23 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31 1991 1546 105.1 — — — — +2 +38 +164 27.8% -1.47 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.04
24 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54 1992 1523 112.5 — — — — +36 +91 +101 37.1% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.67
25 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15 1993 1638 128.5 — — — — -13 -51 +65 46.1% -0.12 5–3 (63%) 2–6 (25%) 100.6 +1.03
26 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13 1994 1582 122.3 — — — — -41 -57 +220 44.4% -0.69 3–10 (23%) 6–1 (86%) 97.8 +0.97
27 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39 1995 1552 111.8 — — — — -75 -12 +209 39.4% -0.45 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 94.1 +0.07
28 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 1996 1468 102.9 — — — — +24 -5 — 15.0% -2.40 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1532 103.8 — — — — -26 -77 +234 46.2% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — +0.63
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1570 108.1 — — — — -36 -153 +178 40.0% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.2 +0.61
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1513 94.5 — — — — -8 -138 +218 22.2% -2.37 1–0 — — +0.07
Career — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98 — 1762 124.1 — — — — -30 -44 +125 43.2% -0.54 39–51 (43%) 26–34 (43%) 97.6 +1.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.