H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Fang Li vs Louise Field H2H: 1-0
Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1994 Beijing third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1994* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Fang Li | 6-2 6-2 | Louise Field | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fang Li | Louise Field | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |