H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Fang Li vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-2

Nana Smith holds a 2–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nana Smith leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1995 Pattaya round of 32 6-7 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith #119 6-7 6-1 6-2 Fang Li #92 Match data Nov 16, 1995* R32 Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Nana Smith #343 7-5 4-6 6-3 Fang Li #95 Match data Apr 7, 1994* R32 Tokyo Japan Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fang Li Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fang Li Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fang Li Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.