H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Feber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1995 ASB Classic round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Nancy Feber | Match data | Feb 2, 1995* | R32 | ASB Classic | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,707 | 67 | 90 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nancy Feber | #589 | #79 | 219 | 1,566 | 25 | 47 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fang Li | Nancy Feber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Fang Li | Nancy Feber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1992 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1993 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1996 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1994 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1997 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 46 | 55 | 101 | 45.5% | 17 | 21 | 38 | 44.7% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | 10 | 24 | 34 | 29.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Fang Li | Nancy Feber | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1502 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | +0.25 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1487 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | — | 26.9% | -1.54 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.06 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1483 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | -15 | — | +102 | 36.7% | -0.73 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +0.24 |
| 19 | 1992 | 1544 | 119.3 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 39.3% | -0.68 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.13 | 1995 | 1550 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | -78 | — | +71 | 45.8% | -0.15 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.43 |
| 20 | 1993 | 1529 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +30 | +31 | — | 33.3% | -1.36 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.54 | 1996 | 1513 | 113.7 | — | — | — | — | -89 | — | +173 | 45.5% | -0.27 | 0–8 (0%) | 4–0 (100%) | 95.3 | +1.75 |
| 21 | 1994 | 1609 | 120.8 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +8 | — | 49.2% | -0.22 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.0 | +0.90 | 1997 | 1516 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | -48 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.70 | — | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.12 |
| 22 | 1995 | 1623 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | -4 | — | — | 55.3% | +0.32 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1996 | 1592 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | — | 38.1% | -0.48 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.6 | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1997 | 1600 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1998 | 1676 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -58 | — | 49.0% | -0.06 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–2 (75%) | 107.9 | +1.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1999 | 1586 | 117.9 | — | — | — | — | +101 | -16 | — | 37.8% | -0.59 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 97.9 | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2000 | 1542 | 89.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 1500 | 92.6 | — | — | — | — | +80 | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1707 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -30 | — | 44.1% | -0.42 | 22–21 (51%) | 14–15 (48%) | 100.5 | +1.98 | — | 1567 | 115.2 | — | — | — | — | -40 | — | +114 | 40.7% | -0.55 | 4–16 (20%) | 7–4 (64%) | 94.3 | +3.85 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Grande | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 8, 2001 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 2, 1999 | H2H |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 3 | 0 | 3 | Mar 19, 1999 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 2 | 1 | 3 | Nov 21, 1998 | H2H |
| Emanuela Zardo | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 22, 1994 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Els Callens | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 24, 1996 | H2H |
| Meredith Mcgrath | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 30, 1996 | H2H |
| Rita Grande | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 27, 1997 | H2H |
| Anne Miller | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 21, 1996 | H2H |