H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Fang Li vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 1-0
Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Arendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1995 Hobart fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1995* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Fang Li | 6-3 6-0 | Nicole Arendt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Arendt | #433 | #49 | 487 | 1,776 | 67 | 75 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fang Li | Nicole Arendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #73 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #143 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |