H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fang Li vs Patty Fendick H2H: 1-0
Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1994 Singapore fourth round 6-1 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1994* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Fang Li | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fang Li | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |