H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Fang Li vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 2-0
Fang Li holds a 2–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fang Li leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1998 Budapest third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1998* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Fang Li | 6-1 6-0 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1993* | Melbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Fang Li | 7-5 6-2 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fang Li | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |