H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Fang Li vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 2-0

Fang Li holds a 2–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fang Li leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1998 Budapest round of 32 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Wiltrud Probst
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fang Li #44 6-1 6-0 Wiltrud Probst #113 Match data Apr 23, 1998* R32 Budapest Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Fang Li #103 7-5 6-2 Wiltrud Probst #39 Match data Jan 14, 1993* R32 Melbourne Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wiltrud Probst #794 #31 344 1,756 119 161 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fang Li Wiltrud Probst
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1986 4–5 44.4% #135 1,510 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1987 9–14 39.1% #99 1,569 0 0
19 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0 1988 13–17 43.3% #80 1,623 0 0
20 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0 1989 11–13 45.8% #90 1,651 0 0
21 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0 1990 19–14 57.6% #40 1,706 0 1
22 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0 1991 9–18 33.3% #126 1,581 0 1
23 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0 1992 16–13 55.2% #40 1,707 0 2
24 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0 1993 10–18 35.7% #105 1,611 0 2
25 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0 1994 11–14 44.0% #69 1,630 0 2
26 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0 1995 7–11 38.9% #146 1,617 0 2
27 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0 1996 1–6 14.3% #113 1,574 0 2
28 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0 1997 7–9 43.8% #84 1,600 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 2–9 18.2% #194 1,556 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fang Li Wiltrud Probst
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 3 2 5 60.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
24 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 6 5 11 54.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
Career — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — 37 51 88 42.0% 63 66 129 48.8% 7 15 22 31.8% 12 29 41 29.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fang Li Wiltrud Probst
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1511 104.4 — — — — +66 +21 — 42.1% -0.32 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +1.63
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1570 115.5 — — — — -32 +23 -24 41.5% -0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.79
19 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1988 1623 127.8 — — — — -71 +18 -77 43.1% -0.81 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 -1.73
20 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54 1989 1651 120.9 — — — — -107 +48 — 46.4% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.4 +0.43
21 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90 1990 1707 126.7 — — — — -62 +51 — 55.1% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.71
22 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34 1991 1581 115.5 — — — — -35 +106 -2 37.1% -0.81 3–5 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.0 -0.14
23 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31 1992 1707 141.5 — — — — -116 +108 — 54.0% +0.51 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 101.8 +0.07
24 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54 1993 1612 123.6 — — — — -42 +134 — 38.8% -0.58 5–6 (45%) 1–5 (17%) 95.7 +0.32
25 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15 1994 1631 135.0 — — — — 0 +60 — 48.2% -0.11 1–5 (17%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.74
26 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13 1995 1617 117.8 — — — — -12 +72 — 38.9% -0.95 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.10
27 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39 1996 1574 110.6 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.29
28 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 1997 1601 114.5 — — — — +11 +34 -44 32.4% -1.59 5–1 (83%) 1–1 — -0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1556 112.7 — — — — +45 +4 — 24.0% -2.32 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.45
Career — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98 — 1756 130.7 — — — — -44 +58 -41 43.1% -0.53 42–40 (51%) 26–33 (44%) 100.9 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.