H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Federica Bonsignori vs Halle Cioffi H2H: 0-2
Halle Cioffi holds a 2–0 lead over Federica Bonsignori in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Halle Cioffi leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Halle Cioffi won the 1992 Hilton Head second round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1992* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Halle Cioffi | 6-0 6-2 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1987* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Halle Cioffi | 0-6 6-4 6-3 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federica Bonsignori | #813 | #28 | 30 | 1,709 | 75 | 112 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Federica Bonsignori | Halle Cioffi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #144 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #142 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1986 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #50 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #211 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |