H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Federica Bonsignori vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-2
Laura Arraya holds a 2–0 lead over Federica Bonsignori in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1992 Houston third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1992* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-2 6-0 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
| May 14, 1987* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-3 6-3 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federica Bonsignori | #813 | #28 | 30 | 1,709 | 75 | 112 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Federica Bonsignori | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #144 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #142 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1986 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1990 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #50 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #211 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |