H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Federica Bonsignori vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-2
Federica Bonsignori and Mercedes Paz are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Federica Bonsignori won the 1992 Paris fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 58
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1992* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Federica Bonsignori | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1992* | San Marino | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Federica Bonsignori | 6-2 5-7 6-4 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| May 29, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 7-5 6-0 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1985* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-2 6-4 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federica Bonsignori | #813 | #28 | 30 | 1,709 | 75 | 112 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Federica Bonsignori | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #144 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #142 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #50 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1993 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #211 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |