H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Fiorella Bonicelli vs Isabel Fernandez De Soto H2H: 2-0
Fiorella Bonicelli holds a 2–0 lead over Isabel Fernandez De Soto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fiorella Bonicelli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fiorella Bonicelli won the 1972 Ecuador final 6-8 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1972* | Ecuador | WTA 250 | F | — | Fiorella Bonicelli | 6-8 6-3 6-0 | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | Match data |
| May 25, 1972* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Fiorella Bonicelli | 6-4 6-4 | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiorella Bonicelli | — | — | — | 1,866 | 135 | 97 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Isabel Fernandez De Soto | — | — | — | 1,783 | 90 | 106 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fiorella Bonicelli | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1973 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1974 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1975 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1976 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1977 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1978 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |