H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Fiorella Bonicelli vs Maria Eugenia Guzman H2H: 1-0
Fiorella Bonicelli holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Eugenia Guzman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fiorella Bonicelli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fiorella Bonicelli won the 1972 Toronto third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1972 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Fiorella Bonicelli | 6-1 6-2 | Maria Eugenia Guzman | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiorella Bonicelli | — | — | — | 1,866 | 135 | 97 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Maria Eugenia Guzman | — | — | — | 1,654 | 53 | 58 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fiorella Bonicelli | Maria Eugenia Guzman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 11 | 1968 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 12 | 1969 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1976 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 12 | 1970 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1977 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 12 | 1971 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1978 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |