H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Flavia Pennetta vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 0-4
Anna Smashnova holds a 4–0 lead over Flavia Pennetta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anna Smashnova leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Smashnova won the 2005 Modena semifinal 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2005* | Modena | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 7-5 6-3 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| May 26, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 6-1 6-4 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| May 14, 2004* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 6-2 6-2 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| May 15, 2003* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 6-4 7-6(4) | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flavia Pennetta | Anna Smashnova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |