H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Flavia Pennetta vs Catalina Castano H2H: 1-1
Flavia Pennetta and Catalina Castano are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2006 Rome third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2006* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Flavia Pennetta | 6-3 6-3 | Catalina Castano | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2004* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Catalina Castano | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,703 | 83 | 109 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flavia Pennetta | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |