H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Flavia Pennetta vs Kimiko Date H2H: 0-1
Kimiko Date holds a 1–0 lead over Flavia Pennetta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 2014 Monterrey third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 7-5 6-2 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data | Apr 3, 2014* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,985 | 420 | 274 | 60.5% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flavia Pennetta | Kimiko Date | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #13 | 1,895 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,859 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,815 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,842 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |