H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Flavia Pennetta vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 5-2

Flavia Pennetta holds a 5–2 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Flavia Pennetta leads 3–2 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2013 Acapulco third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Flavia Pennetta
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 28, 2013* Acapulco WTA 250 R32 Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #56 7-5 6-3 Flavia Pennetta #65 Match data
Mar 21, 2012* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Flavia Pennetta #26 6-4 2-6 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #100 Match data
Jan 21, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Flavia Pennetta #25 6-2 6-2 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #84 Match data
Jul 11, 2008* Palermo WTA 250 R16 Clay Flavia Pennetta #21 6-2 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #103 Match data
Mar 1, 2007* Acapulco WTA 500 R32 Clay Flavia Pennetta #42 6-3 6-3 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #64 Match data
Feb 26, 2006* Bogota WTA 500 F Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #89 7-6(3) 6-4 Flavia Pennetta #18 Match data
Feb 20, 2005* Bogota WTA 500 F Clay Flavia Pennetta #36 7-6(4) 6-4 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #196 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Flavia Pennetta #15 #6 3,621 1,982 418 272 60.6% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Flavia Pennetta Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2002 1–3 25.0% #95 1,482 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2003 18–20 47.4% #69 1,559 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2004 30–22 57.7% #38 1,670 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2005 37–21 63.8% #23 1,777 0 3 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2006 29–18 61.7% #28 1,729 0 3 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2007 30–24 55.6% #39 1,768 0 4 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2008 50–23 68.5% #13 1,900 0 6 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2009 52–23 69.3% #12 1,902 0 8 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2010 45–23 66.2% #24 1,847 0 9 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2011 31–22 58.5% #20 1,785 0 9 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2012 19–13 59.4% #45 1,735 0 9 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2013 19–20 48.7% #31 1,745 0 9 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 2014 30–20 60.0% #12 1,780 0 10 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2015 27–20 57.4% #8 1,823 1 11 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2