H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Flavia Pennetta vs Martina Hingis H2H: 1-3
Martina Hingis holds a 3–1 lead over Flavia Pennetta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 San Diego fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2006* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| May 20, 2006* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-1 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| May 10, 2006* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 7-5 6-3 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2006* | Gold Coast | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 1-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flavia Pennetta | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |