H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Flavia Pennetta vs Mary Pierce H2H: 1-2
Mary Pierce holds a 2–1 lead over Flavia Pennetta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2005 Moscow fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2005* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Mary Pierce | 6-3 6-1 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Feb 8, 2003* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flavia Pennetta | Mary Pierce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 |
| 23 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 |
| 24 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 |
| 27 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 |
| 28 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 |
| 29 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 |
| 30 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 |
| 31 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 |
| 32 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |