H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Flavia Pennetta vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-3
Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 3–1 lead over Flavia Pennetta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2009 's-Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 2-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
THA
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2009* | 's-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Tamarine Tanasugarn | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2004* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Tamarine Tanasugarn | 7-5 3-0 (ret.) | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2004* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 7-5 6-2 | Tamarine Tanasugarn | Match data |
| Feb 8, 2003* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Tamarine Tanasugarn | 7-5 6-4 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | #947 | #19 | 1,508 | 1,818 | 267 | 273 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flavia Pennetta | Tamarine Tanasugarn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #213 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #75 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #47 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #71 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #28 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #122 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #72 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #101 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 | 2010 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #62 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #94 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,594 | 0 | 4 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #855 | 1,577 | 0 | 4 |