H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Flora Perfetti vs Cecilia Dahlman H2H: 0-1

Cecilia Dahlman holds a 1–0 lead over Flora Perfetti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cecilia Dahlman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cecilia Dahlman won the 1993 Prague round of 32 6-3 6-2.

ITA Age 57 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
SWE Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cecilia Dahlman #128 6-3 6-2 Flora Perfetti #216 Match data Jul 16, 1993* R32 Prague Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Flora Perfetti #415 #54 419 1,600 31 59 34.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cecilia Dahlman #405 #63 17 1,673 38 63 37.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Flora Perfetti Cecilia Dahlman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 0–1 0.0% #297 1,482 0 0
19 1988 2–5 28.6% #165 1,478 0 0
20 1989 9–9 50.0% #94 1,585 0 1
21 1990 16–20 44.4% #82 1,639 0 2
22 1991 6–18 25.0% #189 1,490 0 2
23 1992 3–4 42.9% #108 1,515 0 0 1992 2–4 33.3% #123 1,497 0 2
24 1993 1–9 10.0% #315 1,435 0 0 1993 3–6 33.3% #192 1,512 0 2
26 1995 3–7 30.0% #120 1,458 0 0
27 1996 10–9 52.6% #69 1,563 0 0
28 1997 7–15 31.8% #102 1,555 0 0
29 1998 6–12 33.3% #112 1,525 0 0
30 1999 1–3 25.0% #225 1,490 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Flora Perfetti Cecilia Dahlman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1991 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1993 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1997 4 3 7 57.1% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 7 13 20 35.0% 21 39 60 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 18 24 25.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 7 9 16 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Flora Perfetti Cecilia Dahlman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1482 96.1 0.0% -2.50 +0.21
19 1988 1478 107.9 +33 38.9% -0.72 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.25
20 1989 1586 124.1 -77 +74 47.6% -0.36 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.9 +1.53
21 1990 1640 129.0 -81 +22 -22 46.3% -0.49 3–5 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 +0.28
22 1991 1490 103.6 +47 +73 +72 26.5% -1.57 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.0 +1.03
23 1992 1516 104.7 +55 47.1% -0.23 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.37 1992 1497 105.9 +33 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.33
24 1993 1436 96.5 +51 10.0% -3.30 2–0 +0.34 1993 1513 115.6 +90 35.0% -1.05 1–1 0–3 (0%) -0.48
26 1995 1459 119.3 +79 36.4% -0.86 0–2 -0.34
27 1996 1564 117.4 +56 51.1% +0.23 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.7 +0.60
28 1997 1556 120.2 0 -28 38.5% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.32
29 1998 1525 112.3 +36 -42 37.5% -1.25 1–3 (25%) +0.80
30 1999 1491 94.9 +50 30.0% -1.60 1–1 1–0 +0.65
Career 1601 116.6 +18 +24 38.5% -0.88 10–18 (36%) 9–5 (64%) 100.7 +3.04 1673 122.0 -16 +52 +9 39.8% -0.82 12–16 (43%) 13–9 (59%) 101.7 +3.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.