H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Flora Perfetti vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-2
Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 2–0 lead over Flora Perfetti in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1997 Roland Garros third round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 57
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Mary Joe Fernandez | 6-3 7-6(4) | Flora Perfetti | Match data |
| May 14, 1997* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mary Joe Fernandez | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Flora Perfetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flora Perfetti | #415 | #54 | 419 | 1,600 | 31 | 59 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | #136 | #4 | 2,114 | 2,191 | 409 | 192 | 68.1% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flora Perfetti | Mary Joe Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,977 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #8 | 2,062 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #7 | 2,054 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #14 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #8 | 2,038 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1993 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #315 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,926 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,932 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1996 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #69 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #38 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1997 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |