H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Flora Perfetti vs Silke Meier H2H: 1-1
Flora Perfetti and Silke Meier are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Flora Perfetti leads 1–0 on clay, while Silke Meier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Flora Perfetti won the 1996 Rome second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 57
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1996* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Flora Perfetti | 6-1 7-5 | Silke Meier | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Silke Meier | 4-6 6-0 6-3 | Flora Perfetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flora Perfetti | #415 | #54 | 419 | 1,600 | 31 | 59 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flora Perfetti | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #315 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #69 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |