H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Florencia Labat vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-6

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 6–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1997 Roland Garros round of 64 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 6
6 main-draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Florencia Labat #39 Match data May 29, 1997* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #13 6-4 7-6 Florencia Labat #51 Match data Feb 20, 1997* R32 Hanover Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #15 3-6 6-3 7-6 Florencia Labat #43 Match data Mar 11, 1995* QF Delray Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #32 6-1 6-4 Florencia Labat #66 Match data Aug 29, 1992* SF Schenectady Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #27 1-6 6-3 7-5 Florencia Labat #67 Match data Apr 9, 1992* R32 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #87 7-6 6-3 Florencia Labat #79 Match data Apr 10, 1991* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florencia Labat Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,675 0 0
18 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0
19 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0
20 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2
22 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3
23 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3
24 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,780 0 0 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5
25 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6
26 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7
27 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,652 0 7
29 2000 8–10 44.4% #106 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florencia Labat Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0%
18 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
24 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
26 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2%
27 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8% — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florencia Labat Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1483 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 1986 1491 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1516 114.3 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +0.98
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -3 -46 -109 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.87
18 1989 1546 110.9 — — — — +37 +1 — 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.52 1989 1600 127.5 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98
19 1990 1573 118.7 — — — — +20 -15 — 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08 1990 1676 128.3 — — — — +2 -134 -49 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09
20 1991 1671 134.2 — — — — -10 -1 — 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64 1991 1799 143.8 — — — — -69 -241 +12 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70
21 1992 1730 132.2 — — — — +20 -68 — 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 — +0.14 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55
22 1993 1762 141.4 — — — — -20 +7 -160 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -104 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23
23 1994 1788 139.9 — — — — -25 — -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33
24 1995 1781 133.7 — — — — -26 +8 — 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.32 1995 1971 149.3 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45
25 1996 1772 142.8 — — — — +32 -66 -49 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +44 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96
26 1997 1675 134.1 — — — — +5 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20
27 1998 1656 126.6 — — — — +51 -6 +31 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.12 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05
28 1999 1620 118.4 — — — — +82 -10 — 35.0% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.60 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
29 2000 1609 110.7 — — — — +27 +28 — 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1614 101.2 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +53 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1592 96.8 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.16
Career — 1868 138.5 — — — — +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.39 — 2025 147.4 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.