H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 2-0
Florencia Labat holds a 2–0 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1992 Key Biscayne second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 6-2 6-0 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 6-1 3-6 7-6(2) | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Florencia Labat | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |