H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Catherine Mothes Jobkel H2H: 0-2
Catherine Mothes Jobkel holds a 2–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catherine Mothes Jobkel leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Mothes Jobkel won the 1992 Taranto third round 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1992* | Taranto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1990* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | 6-4 6-4 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catherine Mothes Jobkel | — | — | — | 1,605 | 22 | 32 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |