H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Elna Reinach H2H: 2-0
Florencia Labat holds a 2–0 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1993 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Florencia Labat | 6-2 6-3 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| May 12, 1993* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Florencia Labat | 6-0 7-6 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |