H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Florencia Labat vs Emilse Raponi Longo H2H: 0-1
Emilse Raponi Longo holds a 1–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilse Raponi Longo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilse Raponi Longo won the 1986 Buenos Aires second round 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 68
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1986* | Buenos Aires | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Emilse Raponi Longo | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emilse Raponi Longo | — | — | — | 1,592 | 32 | 62 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Florencia Labat | Emilse Raponi Longo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |